Page 34 - Zbornik_Konf_2019
P. 34

https://doi.org/10.15414/2019.9788055220703

            4  International Scientific Conference                                           Abstracts Book
              th
              COMPARISON OF ANTIOXIDATIVE PROPERTIES OF FRUIT POMACE FROM DIFFERENT
                                        CULTIVARS OF HONEYSUCKLE BERRY
                               Marta Gołba, Anna Sokół‐Łętowska, Alicja Kucharska

                             Department of Fruit, Vegetable and Plant Nutraceutical Technology,
              Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Science, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences,
                                    Wrocław, Poland; E-mail.: marta.golba@upwr.edu.pl

                  According to the current studies, honeysuckle berry fruit show antioxidant, anti-
            inflammatory, anti-cancer properties, as well as cardio and neuroprotective. Researchers have
            analyzed a vast content of iridoids and phenolic compounds in the fruit. Additionally,
            numerous cultivars of honeysuckle berry have been identified. Many researches depict that
            existing cultivars differ in the content of anthocyanins, flavonoids, phenolic acids. The
            compounds being present in the fruit are able to neutralize reactive oxygen species, which is
            mostly associated with the presence of polyphenols. Therefore, it becomes crucial to
            determine the cultivars with the greatest content of bioactive compounds and best health
            properties. An important aspect of the research is focusing on the side product being formed
            during juice pressing-pomace. They are often considered as a waste product, while they might
            be a source of vital bioactive substances.  An analysis of the compounds contained in
            honeysuckle berry pomace could potentially correspond to minimizing the waste product and
            thus decreasing the production costs.
                  The aim of the research was  to determine  the antioxidant  activity of analyzed fruit
            pomace its being important in terms of science and application and to compare the impact of
            different extraction conditions.
                  In this study, the pomace of 5 honeysuckle berry cultivars were analyzed: Jugana, Honey
            Bee, Indigo Gem, Wojtek Docz Velikana. The antioxidant activity was measured using ABTS,
            FRAP, DPPH methods. The extracts for the analysis were prepared using 8 different
            conditions: 25 % methanol + 1ml/L HCl, 50 % methanol + 1ml/L HCl, 80 % methanol + 1ml/L
            HCl, 100 % methanol + 1ml/L HCl, H2O 100  C, H2O 40  C, 25 % methanol, 50 % methanol.
                                                         o
                                                                    o
                  Among the analyzed cultivars, the highest ABTS value showed Wojtek, while the lowest
            activity indicated Docz Velikana (1.63 mM Tx/100 g). In terms of FRAP the highest result was
            measured in cultivar Jugana (12.03 mM Tx/100 g), and the lowest in Docz Velikana (1.45 mM
            Tx/100 g). The last analysis- DPPH, showed the highest activity of Jugana (4.65 mM Tx/100
            g), and the lowest of Docz Velikana (0.31 mM Tx/100 g). In terms of extraction method, more
            concentrated methanol (50 % and more) provided in more effective extraction.
                  It can be concluded that fruit pomace shows antioxidant activity and the differences
            between various varieties can be observed. Pomace is, therefore, a promising source of
            bioactive compounds and do not have to be considered as a waste product.

            Keywords: honeysuckle berry, cultivars, antioxidant, fruit pomace.
























            |34    4  International Scientific Conference Agrobiodiversity Nutrition, Health and Quality of Human and Bees Life
                    th
                                                       September 11–13, 2019
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39